﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Komentarze do: Walka ze spamem jako narzędzie digitalizacji książek &#8211; reCAPTCHA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historiaimedia.org/2007/12/09/walka-ze-spamem-jako-narzedzie-digitalizacji-ksiazek-recaptcha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historiaimedia.org/2007/12/09/walka-ze-spamem-jako-narzedzie-digitalizacji-ksiazek-recaptcha/</link>
	<description>digital history, digital humanities, historia obecna w mediach, nowa humanistyka, konferencje naukowe</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:41:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Autor: mw</title>
		<link>http://historiaimedia.org/2007/12/09/walka-ze-spamem-jako-narzedzie-digitalizacji-ksiazek-recaptcha/comment-page-1/#comment-558</link>
		<dc:creator>mw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:31:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historiaimedia.org/2007/12/09/walka-ze-spamem-jako-narzedzie-digitalizacji-ksiazek-recaptcha/#comment-558</guid>
		<description>But if a computer can&#039;t read such a CAPTCHA, how does the system know the correct answer to the puzzle? Here&#039;s how: Each new word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is given to a user in conjunction with another word for which the answer is already known. The user is then asked to read both words. If they solve the one for which the answer is known, the system assumes their answer is correct for the new one. The system then gives the new image to a number of other people to determine, with higher confidence, whether the original answer was correct.
http://recaptcha.net/learnmore.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But if a computer can&#8217;t read such a CAPTCHA, how does the system know the correct answer to the puzzle? Here&#8217;s how: Each new word that cannot be read correctly by OCR is given to a user in conjunction with another word for which the answer is already known. The user is then asked to read both words. If they solve the one for which the answer is known, the system assumes their answer is correct for the new one. The system then gives the new image to a number of other people to determine, with higher confidence, whether the original answer was correct.<br />
<a href="http://recaptcha.net/learnmore.html" rel="nofollow">http://recaptcha.net/learnmore.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Autor: janek</title>
		<link>http://historiaimedia.org/2007/12/09/walka-ze-spamem-jako-narzedzie-digitalizacji-ksiazek-recaptcha/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>janek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historiaimedia.org/2007/12/09/walka-ze-spamem-jako-narzedzie-digitalizacji-ksiazek-recaptcha/#comment-557</guid>
		<description>No tak tylko w jaki sposób te obrazki będą weryfikowane ?? Jeżeli przed pokazaniem obrazka nie wiemy co na nim jest ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No tak tylko w jaki sposób te obrazki będą weryfikowane ?? Jeżeli przed pokazaniem obrazka nie wiemy co na nim jest ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
